Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Perception, Accumulation, Circulation and Materialization: The Employment of Objects by the Grange Prize Nominees

By Joan Wilson







The Grange Prize exhibition at the Art Gallery of Ontario (September 22 2010- January 30 2011) brings together the work of Josh Brand, Kristan Horton, Moyra Davey, and Leslie Hewitt. Each artist creates photographs in a different way, addressing particular ideas, while they all share a commonality: the use or representation of objects. Visually, the work of each artist is distinct, but they all draw on the theme of objects, whether it is through the creation, the subject matter, the use, or the concept of the photograph.
Upon entering the exhibition, the first artist’s work to be viewed is that of Josh Brand. Situated in their own small area of the space, the immediate striking feature of Brand’s seven photographs is their small scale. With so many contemporary photographers presenting work at such large scales, the intimacy of Brand’s images is refreshing. The photographs, abstract in nature, present a connection between the artist and the final object. Portraying only lines and shapes, there is no sense of the involvement of a camera in the process of his work. The viewer is lead to imagine the artist in the darkroom delicately and thoughtfully creating the photographs. All chromogenic and silver gelatin prints, the images reference the tactility of traditional photographic techniques. It is unclear what objects Brand would have used to create the photographs, but it is clear that his process is a key element to the concept of his work. This uncertainty itself evokes feelings of fragmented memory, altered perception, and abstract thoughts when viewing his photographs.
The next artist to be viewed is Kristan Horton, whose work is located adjacent to Brand’s in a separate room. Of the three separate series of works, Horton’s Orbits (2009) series is the most compelling, drawing the viewer in with questions concerning the subjects the images are actually portraying. In contrast to Brand’s photographs, Horton’s Orbits are large-scale prints at 135x102 cm. Three from the series are displayed: Doorknob, Dark Center and The Original. The images portray piles of random objects photographed from above. Many of the items are indistinguishable, but one does not get the sense that the specificity of the objects is the focus of the photographs. When closely viewing the images, it can be seen that some of the objects are repeated and overlapping with each other, creating a sense of accumulation, time and space.
When entering the next room, Moyra Davey and Leslie Hewitt’s works are seen. Davey displays three separate bodies of work: a video piece, and two photographic series. The first photographic series, Copper Heads (1990), shows three magnified images of the Abraham Lincoln side of the American penny. Although each photograph is of the same object, they are all strikingly different in texture and colour, alluding to the individual ‘experience’ of each penny. Davey’s second series, The Whites of your Eyes (For Bill Horrigan) (2010), displays twenty-four photographs in a grid. The photographs themselves are of daily life, coffee cups, the newspaper, etc., but the prints have been folded and have writing and postage on them, breaking away from conventional ways of thinking about fine art photography, in terms of treating a photograph so delicately. These images have been mailed; they have been handled and damaged, but there is still a sense of preciousness to them. By folding and mailing the photographs, Davey has actually turned them into objects to be handled. Although these two bodies of work were made twenty years apart, there is a distinct connection between them; both examine the circulation of an object and the physical indications of its experiences in circulation.
Leslie Hewitt displays three photographs from her Midday Series (2009). The two most striking images are her large 132x159 cm chromogenic prints mounted in wood frames that sit on the floor of the gallery. The photographs themselves portray objects leaning against a blank white wall, which is mirrored in the way the photographs are then displayed. As noted by Hewitt, her interest in sculpture and the materiality of objects drove her to create the pieces that occupy space within the gallery. By mounting the photographs and setting them on the floor, Hewitt is turning them back into a physical object, which the viewer is then more strongly confronted by. The objects in the photographs at first seem arbitrary, but the inclusion of snapshots- most likely family snapshots, references a personal history.
Whether the nominees for the Grange Prize were chosen individually, or in conjunction with one another, their works have an undeniable connection. They all exclude the actual representation of people in their photographs, instead examining human traces left in the form of objects.


Joan Wilson studies at OCAD U
this post was added by Gabrielle Moser, her instructor

Art Battle 9 at the Great Hall



By Vanessa Krause

Art Battle is a local event that has developed over time to be one of the most popular live action painting extravaganzas ever. It is based on the idea that four people are randomly selected, given materials to paint on/with, including the paint itself. The battles are staged at the center of a large hall and the painters are situated at their own easel in the middle. All painters are given 20 minutes to paint competitively, while loud music plays in the background with 200 people in the audience. The crowd is constantly in motion and alcohol is served.

It is comparable to a live action wrestling match: the tension, the excitement, the process, the end result. After each round, the “patrons” (audience) vote for the winner by placing a ticket with the number 1, 2 or 3, whichever corresponds to the round, in a ballot box in front of their chosen painting. There are usually 2 rounds of 4 painters and from those, the winners of the 2 various bouts face-off in a final (30 minute) round of live action painting! For the first time in the history of Art Battle (Art Battle 9 which took place November 23, 2010) the winner was awarded a $400.00 prize. The “non-winner” of the final round was awarded $100. A live auction follows each art battle; the minimum bid is $50. If a painting does not receive a minimum bid it is “ceremoniously destroyed” with a chainsaw.

In Art Battle 4, the first one I attended on April 27, 2010 a painting was not bid on, and with cheers from the crowd it was cut apart by the chainsaw’s mighty teeth. It seemed like a primal, blasphemous and sadistic action, however, it reminded me of performance art.

Art Battle calls to mind the 1949 work “Monotone Symphony” by French artist Yves Klein; where he combined music, painting and performance art. Although his concept varies very much from Art Battle (primarily, because the painting is done by the artists in Art Battle and not nude women covered in paint) it seems to have the “wow” factor of the performance. In general, painting is an activity conducted in solitude, and Art Battle takes this solitary activity and makes it a happening. It forces the painter to think quickly, react and create on demand. It makes the imagination respond like a reflex without contemplation. Art Battle takes painting to a different place; it makes the painter create without time for second thoughts and perfectionist barriers. These works of art cannot be classified as gallery style material; they are the evidence left behind by the flow of creativity. They become something new.
Art Battle 9 was video taped for CBC’s “The Steven and Chris Show”. It was the first art battle to offer a winner’s purse, and was held at its traditional location at the Great Hall on Queen Street West and Dovercourt. Art Battle traditionally starts with a speech from Chris Pemberton, welcoming everyone to the great hall. He then chooses four names from a “magic hat” or in this case a lottery style roller with numbered ping-pong balls in it. Artists can sign up at the door to participate. Once the names are picked and the canvases and easels selected, the art battle begins.

For round one, four artists (Ben Soderberg, Tanja Gruber, Spencer Barclay and Jonathan Lau) were selected. Ben Soderberg was the champion of round one; he had to face Jamie Ashforth (multiple Art Battle champion) the winner of round two. Jamie Ashforth faced Tony Smerek, Danielle Cole and Dave Sheppard. Jamie has created some very interesting abstract work, using colour and blending techniques. In the work that won her the second round, she added a boat and a house (seemingly flying), which really made her work feel more developed and solid. The presence of a visible subject matter in her work was a very nice addition. Ben won his first round by painting a portrait of a mysterious face using only dark tones of blue and black and white for very strong highlights.

In the final round of Art Battle 9, Jamie started out with subject matter on her canvas, but buried it beneath layered colours, whereas Ben was very direct in his approach and created a very solid looking robot. At the end of the match, long time champion Jamie was defeated by the newcomer Ben. Other Art Battle champions and participants have been OCAD U’s own Marco Bertuzzo and David MacKenzie.

This strange, staged and colourful event is so successful because it is inclusive of many age groups. It takes the elitist gallery feel, and dismisses it, creating something that is needed: entertainment. Painting is taken off the walls and made into an activity that can be viewed like a sporting event. It has put painting back on the map for a lot of young people, and more traditional art lovers alike.

Vanessa Krause is a second year drawing and painting major at OCAD University.
Instructor: Pete Smith